|
|
Post by Hitotsumami on Jul 4, 2012 12:35:04 GMT -5
Most probably, awww yeah Link |
|
|
|
Post by Shark a' Pult on Jul 4, 2012 13:47:13 GMT -5
There's something much more important going on right now.
America's birthday.
|
|
|
|
Post by CJ on Jul 6, 2012 5:58:28 GMT -5
I wish I knew more about this phenomenon to truly understand it. If it's true, I'm really happy for the world of SCIENCE right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Neurotick on Jul 6, 2012 16:36:02 GMT -5
Little help for you CJ. Basically, physicists were looking for why particles have "gravitational mass" to them. Sort of the stuff that makes things have weight.
|
|
|
|
Post by Shark a' Pult on Jul 7, 2012 0:03:26 GMT -5
Pffft what a load of bullshit made up by no-good stuff shirt scientist loser nerds.
Particles have mass because God made them that way.
|
|
|
|
Post by CJ on Jul 7, 2012 10:32:06 GMT -5
Thanks for the link, ticky. That really helped.
It's unfortunate it was dubbed the "God particle" when it really has nothing to do with creation or anything religious. I get Shark was joking, don't get me wrong, but the mistake really opened up too much discussion.
|
|
|
|
Post by Neurotick on Jul 7, 2012 23:33:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Hitotsumami on Jul 7, 2012 23:38:24 GMT -5
Gotta give you some respect for that Ticky.
|
|
|
|
Post by Shark a' Pult on Jul 8, 2012 1:09:15 GMT -5
Me too!
Everyone rep Ticky for her find!
|
|
|
|
Post by Neurotick on Jul 8, 2012 1:30:05 GMT -5
GODDAMN PARTICLE.
|
|
|
|
Post by Xero on Jul 11, 2012 14:26:06 GMT -5
Its funny how they thought "Goddamn" would be offensive, but calling it the "God Particle" would not create controversy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hitotsumami on Jul 14, 2012 1:52:03 GMT -5
I don't think it would create as much controversy, given the US mostly believes in God, especially when the book came out some 20 years ago.
Although the name certainly has been used in, what I would call, dishonest ways.
|
|
